• Users Online: 221
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page
Home About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 


 
 Table of Contents  
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2019  |  Volume : 46  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 170-176

Asymptomatic left ventricular diastolic dysfunction in diffuse systemic sclerosis patients: conventional echocardiography and left atrial speckle tracking


1 Department of Rheumatology & Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Benha University, Benha; Department of Internal Medicine, Rheumatology Division, Dallah Hospital, Riyadh, KSA, Egypt
2 Department of Cardiololgy, Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig; Department of Cardiology, Dallah Hospital, Riyadh, KSA, Egypt
3 Department of Rheumatology & Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Benha University, Benha; Department of Internal Medicine, Rheumatology Division, Al Adan Hospital, Al Adan, Kuwait

Date of Submission12-Feb-2019
Date of Acceptance04-Mar-2019
Date of Web Publication15-Jul-2019

Correspondence Address:
Ahmed Aboughanima
Dallah Hospital, Fas, An Nakheel, Riyadh 12381
Egypt
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/err.err_15_19

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 


Objective Our objective was to assess asymptomatic left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (LVDD) in diffuse systemic sclerosis (SSc) patients using both conventional and two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography in correlation to disease variables.
Patients and methods Twenty-two patients with diffuse SSc without symptoms of LVDD and 22 controls were included in a comparative cross-sectional study. Skin fibrosis was assessed by modified Rodnan skin thickness score and disease severity by Medsger’s score. Parameters related to diastolic functions of the left ventricle were obtained by conventional echocardiography. Assessment of left atrium (LA) functions was by two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography as a predictor of LVDD.
Results There were significant differences between patients and controls regarding E-wave deceleration time (194.8±27.3 vs. 157.1±20.3; P<0.001), E/E’ (8.85±1.98 vs. 6.99±0.69; P=0.008), positive peak LAε (11.4±2.9 vs. 18.8±2.28; P<0.001), and sec. positive peak LAε (17.5±3.9 vs. 25.5±2.7; P<0.001). All LA strain parameters were significantly correlated with disease duration, disease severity, N-terminal pro b-type natriuretic peptide, E/E’, and E-wave deceleration time, while positive peak LAε was correlated with the modified Rodnan skin thickness score. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis identified a positive peak value of less than or equal to 10.8 and sec. positive peak of less than or equal to 17.5 as predictors for the detection of E/E’ more than or equal to 8.
Conclusion LA reservoir and conduit functions were significantly affected in SSc patients than controls and were associated with longer disease duration and more severe disease, while only reservoir function was associated with more fibrotic skin changes. All LA strain parameters correlated significantly with E/E’ ratio, while positive peak LA and sec. positive peak LA were demonstrated as LVDD predictors in patients with diffuse SSc.

Keywords: diastolic dysfunction, speckle tracking, systemic sclerosis


How to cite this article:
Aboughanima A, Gomaa A, El Olemy G. Asymptomatic left ventricular diastolic dysfunction in diffuse systemic sclerosis patients: conventional echocardiography and left atrial speckle tracking. Egypt Rheumatol Rehabil 2019;46:170-6

How to cite this URL:
Aboughanima A, Gomaa A, El Olemy G. Asymptomatic left ventricular diastolic dysfunction in diffuse systemic sclerosis patients: conventional echocardiography and left atrial speckle tracking. Egypt Rheumatol Rehabil [serial online] 2019 [cited 2019 Oct 21];46:170-6. Available from: http://www.err.eg.net/text.asp?2019/46/3/170/262697




  Introduction Top


Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a rare connective tissue disease characterized by inflammation and progressive fibrosis involving multiple organs, including the skin, lungs, gastrointestinal tract, kidneys, and the heart. Although cardiac involvement is often clinically asymptomatic [1], it is recognized in a significant number of patients [2],[3].

The pathogenesis of SSc is not entirely understood but microangiopathy and the extensive accumulation of extracellular matrix are the most characteristic features and the resulting fibrosis disrupts the structure of tissues and frequently leads to dysfunction of the affected organs [4].

Myocardial involvement is one of the leading causes of mortality in SSc, the mechanisms of primary myocardial involvement, including the characteristic vascular lesions and fibrous tissue deposition, which lead to coronary microcirculation and myocardial dysfunction [2],[5]. In addition, patients with scleroderma have an increased risk of pulmonary arterial hypertension [6].

Systolic and/or diastolic dysfunction may occur in SSc patients even before any symptoms suggestive of cardiac involvement discovered and both of them carry bad prognostic signs during the disease course. Early detection of cardiac affection is important in the proper management of the disease [7].

Left atrium (LA) assumes a basic part in left ventricular (LV) filling with LA reservoir, pump, and conduit contractile functions [8],[9]. LA functional indices can be assessed by two-dimensional (2D) echocardiography and Doppler echocardiography, such indices is dependent on hemodynamic loading circumstances and geometric hypothesis. Strain imaging employing tissue Doppler imaging (TDI) and two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography (2D-SPE) provide better reproducibility in assessing LA function and serve as a good solution to overcome this problem [10]. Therefore 2D strain imaging speckle tracking of LA has been used as a newer tool for assessing LV function [11].

This study was carried out to assess asymptomatic left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (LVDD) in SSc patients using both conventional echocardiography and two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography (2D-STE) of the LA in correlation to disease variables.


  Patients and methods Top


Twenty-two patients with diffuse SSc were included: 19 women and three men. SSc was diagnosed according to 2013 ACR/EULAR Classification Criteria for scleroderma [12] without history of coronary artery disease, pulmonary hypertension, or reduced ejection fraction (EF %) were collected from the Rheumatology Clinic in Dallah Hospital, Riyadh, KSA. Twenty-two age-matched and sex-matched controls were included. The study protocol was approved by the local ethics committee. All participants provided written consent.

General examination and measurements

Detailed clinical history and physical examination were carried out for all patients. Age, sex, weight, height, body surface area, BMI, blood pressure, and heart rate measurements of the patients and control group were acquired. Modified Rodnan skin thickness score (MRSS) was used to evaluate skin fibrosis; this score consists of an evaluation of patient’s skin thickness rated by clinical palpation using a 0–3 scale (0=normal skin; 1=mild thickness; 2=moderate thickness; 3=severe thickness with inability to pinch the skin into a fold) for each of 17 surface anatomic areas of the body: face, anterior chest, abdomen (right and left separately), fingers, forearms, upper arms, thighs, lower legs, and dorsum of hands and feet. These individual values are added and the sum is defined as the total skin score [13]. SSc severity was assessed according to the Medsger scale, which includes a general status of the patient, peripheral vascular, skin, joints, tendon, muscle, gastrointestinal tract, lung, and kidney involvement [14].

All patients underwent laboratory testing including blood cell count, serum creatinine levels, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), high-sensitive C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), antinuclear antibody (ANA), antiscleroderma 70 (anti scl-70), anti-centromere antibodies, N-terminal pro b-type natriuretic peptide (NT pro-BNP), in addition to diffusion capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO).

Conventional echocardiography and Doppler measurements

Standard transthoracic echocardiography was performed in the left decubitus position using an ultrasound system (acusonsc2000; Siemens, Siemens Medical Solutions, California, USA) with a 3.4 MHz multifrequency transducer. Parameters related to diastolic functions of the LV were obtained as follows: LA maximal volume index (cm3/m2), early (E) and late (A) transmitral flow velocities, the ratio of early to late peak velocities (E/A), and deceleration time (DT) of E velocity were obtained. We followed the update recommendations for the evaluation of LVDD by echocardiography from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging to determine the parameters related to LVDD [15].

LA diameters were measured from the apical four-chamber view. LA areas and volumes were measured using the biplane method of disks (modified Simpson’s rule), in the apical four-chamber and two-chamber view at end systole (maximum LA size), and the mean values of area and volume were obtained [16]. LA volumes were subsequently indexed to body surface area.

The E/A ratio is measured by placing a pulse wave Doppler across the mitral valve and measuring the velocities across the valve. Conventional pulsed Doppler imaging of mitral inflow was recorded from the apical four-chamber view with the Doppler sample placed between the tips of the mitral leaflets. Peak transmitral flow velocity in early diastole (E), peak transmitral flow velocity in late diastole (A), and E/A ratio were measured. DT was defined as a slope from the maximum E point to the baseline [15].

The E/E’ ratio, which has been shown to provide good noninvasive estimates of LV filling pressure, was calculated by dividing the peak E velocity (obtained by pulsed Doppler from the mitral inflow) by the E’ that was measured from the septal, lateral mitral annulus by use of pulse wave TDI. In normal individuals, the E/E’ ratio is less than 8. In the presence of diastolic dysfunction/impaired relaxation, E’ will be rather low, in contrast the E-wave increases with elevated filling pressures. Thus, the E/E’ ratio will increase in the presence of diastolic dysfunction [8].

Pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP) was estimated from peak tricuspid regurgitation jet velocities, with adding average right atrial pressure [17].

Two-dimensional SPE measurements

Using 2D-STE of LA software (EchoInsight; Epsilon, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA), LA endocardial border was traced in the apical four-chamber view, taking care to exclude the appendage and pulmonary veins from the LA cavity. Then, a composite LA longitudinal strain curve throughout the cardiac cycle was generated. This curve comprised six individual atrial segments. If more than 1 atrial segment had to be excluded from the analysis because of suboptimal visualization and tracking, an alternative loop was selected to ensure complete analysis for each participant [18],[19],[20].

The tracking settings allow distinguishing three LA strain values. If the reference point is set at the onset of the QRS, we can measure positive peak atrial longitudinal strain (ε pos peak), which corresponds to an LA reservoir function. If the reference point is set at the onset of the P wave, we can measure both negative atrial longitudinal strain (ε neg peak), which mirrors LA pump function and second positive peak atrial strain (sec. ε pos peak), which corresponds to LA conduit function [21],[22],[23].

Statistical analysis

Numerical data are presented as mean±SD and were tested for a normal distribution using the Shapiro–Wilk test, assuming normality at a P value of more than 0.05. Comparisons between SSc patients and controls were performed using Student’s independent t tests for parametric variables or by Mann–Whitney U test for nonparametric ones. Comparisons between categorical variables were made with χ2 test. Correlations were tested by Pearson’s (r) or Spearman’s (rho) correlation tests for parametric and nonparametric variables, respectively. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to detect cutoff values of positive peak and sec. positive peak with optimum sensitivity and specificity in the detection of E/E’ ratio of less than or equal to 8. All tests were two-sided and P values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant. All analyses were performed using SPSS 20.0.0 (IBM Inc., Chicago, Illinois, USA).


  Results Top


Our study included 22 patients with diffuse SSc (19 women and three men); their age ranged between 25 and 58 years with mean±SD of 37.3±9.3 years and 22 age-matched and sex-matched healthy persons as the control group. The disease duration ranged between 3 and 12 years with a mean±SD of 7.09±2.3 years, MRSS ranged between 3 and 21 with a mean±SD of 11.09±5.5. Medsger disease severity scale ranged between 2 and 13 with a mean±SD value of 7.63±3.2; neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio ranged between 0.62 and 1.3 with a mean±SD value of 0.68±0.14. ESR ranged between 26 and 47 with a mean±SD of 36.9±5.9, the hs-CRP ranged between 10 and 18 with a mean±SD value of 13.2±1.96, all patients had positive ANA, the anti scl-70 antibodies was positive in 18 (81.8%) patients, while anti-centromere antibodies were positive in five (22.7%) patients. The NT pro-BNP ranged between 80 and 230 with a mean±SD of 134.4±42.2 and the DLCO ranged between 70 and 98 with mean±SD of 82.9±8.1 (the demographic, clinical and laboratory parameters of the SSc group are shown in [Table 1]). Conventional echocardiographic findings are presented in [Table 2]. There were significant differences between SSc patients and control group regarding mitral E-wave (DT) and E/E’ ratio, while there were no significant differences regarding LA maximal volume index, EF %, E/A ratio, and PASP P < (0.05). LA 2D-STE findings are presented in [Table 3]. There were significant differences between SSc patients and the control group concerning positive peak LAε and sec. positive peak LAε, while there was no significant difference regarding negative peak LAε.
Table 1 The demographic, clinical, and laboratory parameters of systemic sclerosis patients (N=22)

Click here to view
Table 2 Comparison of conventional and Doppler parameters between systemic sclerosis and control groups

Click here to view
Table 3 Comparison of left atrium two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography parameters between systemic sclerosis and control groups

Click here to view


Pearson’s correlation analysis showed significant correlations of all LA strain parameters (positive LAε, negative LAε, and sec. positive LAε) with disease duration, Medsger severity scale, NT pro-BNP, mitral E/E’ ratio, and E-wave-DT, while only positive peak LAε was correlated with MRSS and sec. positive peak LAε was correlated with ESR. There were no correlations of all LA strain imaging parameters with neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio and hs-CRP ([Table 4]). ROC curve analysis showed that Sec. positive peak LA value of less than or equal to 10.8 has a sensitivity of 90.9%, specificity of 81.8%, positive predictive value of 83.3%, and negative predictive value of 90% for the detection of E/E’ ratio of more than or equal to 8 (area under the curve=0.897, 95% confidence interval=0.76–1.0; P=0.002) and Sec. positive peak LA of less than or equal to 17.5 has a sensitivity of 90.9%, specificity of 90.9%, positive predictive value of 90.9%, and negative predictive value of 90.9% for the detection of E/E’ ratio of more than or equal to 8 (area under the curve=0.95, 95% confidence interval=0.85–1.0; P<0.001) ([Figure 1] and [Table 5]).
Table 4 Correlation of left atrium two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography parameters with systemic sclerosis disease-related variables and conventional echocardiographic findings

Click here to view
Figure 1 ROC curve analysis to sensitivity and specificity of positive peak LAε and sec. positive peak LAε in detection of E/E’ ratio. ROC, receiver operating characteristic.

Click here to view
Table 5 Statistical analysis of receiver operating characteristic curve assessing the ability of positive peak left atrium ε and sec. positive peak left atrium ε to predict E/E’ ratio more than or equal to 8

Click here to view



  Discussion Top


In our study, there were only highly significant differences between SSc patients and control group regarding mitral E-wave (DT) and E/E’ ratio while there were no significant differences regarding LA maximal volume index, EF %, E/A ratio, and pulmonary artery systolic pressure and this can be explained by the fact that all our patients included in the study were asymptomatic and no gross cardiac abnormalities was detected in conventional echocardiographic study and the aim of our study to detect early cardiac involvement in SSc patients.

Mele et al. [24] showed that TDI-derived E/E’ ratio are a valuable approach to detecting cardiac involvement in asymptomatic SSc patients. Also Ataş et al. [25] reported no significant differences between groups regarding LVEF and LA diameter values; however, they noted higher E/E’ ratio and DT in SSc patients than in controls.

In our study, LA function was used as an early predictor of LV diastolic dysfunction in concordance with the study of Abhayaratna et al. [26] who stated that LA function and volumes are useful parameters of LV diastolic and systolic function and are independent predictors of cardiovascular outcomes. Moreover, increase in LV end-diastolic pressure as a consequence of LV systolic and/or diastolic function may lead to structural and functional changes in the LA [27].

The relation between LA function and LV systolic and diastolic function is explained by the following mechanism; in ventricular systole, the filling of the LA from the pulmonary veins is increased by longitudinal shortening of the ventricular base while during diastole, the filling of the LV is granted by active and passive emptying of LA. Additionally, LV diastolic properties may influence the LA emptying function via direct interaction of ventricular pressures by mitral valve opening during diastole [26],[28],[29].

Doppler parameters alone do not give an ideal understanding into defective LV relaxation, and subsequently leading to inaccurate assessment of diastolic dysfunction in SSc patients. Also, abnormal Doppler parameters can be reported in patients with constrictive pericarditis without myocardial association [8].

In the present study, atrium strain imaging parameters of SSc patients were highly significantly different than controls regarding positive peak LAε and sec. positive peak LAε, while there was no significant difference regarding negative peak LAε. Our observations are in full agreement with Agoston et al. [30] who reported that LA reservoir and conduit function were impaired, but contractile function and LA Vmax were similar between SSc patients and healthy controls. In the same context, Ataş et al. [25] observed significantly lower atrial peak-systolic longitudinal strain (ε), early negative strain rate (SR), late negative SR, and peak positive SR values in SSc patients.

Several studies demonstrated that employing 2D strain technique showed an early reduction in longitudinal function in patients with SSc, where the parameters of conventional echocardiography were not suitable to highlight the systolic function impairment [31],[32],[33]. This is on grounds that the myocardial subendocardial layer, primarily in charge of the longitudinal function and more prone to ischemia and fibrosis, is involved before the subepicardial layer [34].

In our study, all LA strain parameters were significantly correlated with disease duration, Medsger severity score, NT pro-BNP, E-wave-DT, and mitral E/E’ ratio; however, only positive peak LAε was correlated with MRSS and sec. positive peak LAε was correlated with ESR. On the other hand, all LA strain parameters were neither correlated with neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio nor hs-CRP.

In agreement with our results, previous studies demonstrated prevalent diastolic dysfunction in SSc patients that was significantly correlated with disease duration [35],[36],[37]. In partial agreement with our results, Ataş et al. [25] found no significant correlations between LA phasic volumes and parameters reflecting the activity of SSc such as MRSS, ESR, and CRP and contributed that to the heterogeneity regarding disease activities at the time of enrollment. Similarly, Appleton et al. [38] stated that ESR and CRP are known to reflect the severity of inflammatory activation at the time of measurement, whereas findings obtained during LA volume and function analyses reflect the chronic effect of LVDD.

In normal individuals, the E/E’ ratio is less than 8. In the presence of diastolic dysfunction/impaired relaxation, E’ will be rather low. In contrast, the E-wave increases with elevated filling pressures. Thus, the E/E’ ratio will increase in the presence of diastolic dysfunction [8].

In our study, ROC curve analysis showed that positive peak LA of less than or equal to 10.8 and sec. positive peak LA of less than or equal to 17.5 were predictors of LV dysfunction (defined by E/E’ ratio ≥8). Previous cohort study by Singh et al. [39] has identified LA stain as a predictor of early diastolic dysfunction, additionally they reported that cutoff values for peak LA strain can be used for the classification of diastolic dysfunction with good to excellent diagnostic utility (area under the curve, 0.86–0.91).

Finally, it is important to have a newer, noninvasive and precise tool like 2D-SPE to identify early impairment of LV function in SSc patients which may lead to increased risk of death, in order to overcome inaccurate findings that may be obtained from conventional echocardiographic assessment. In this regard, we recommend combining 2D-SPE with conventional echocardiography during studying cardiac abnormalities in SSc patients.


  Conclusion Top


LA reservoir and conduit functions were significantly affected in SSc patients than controls and were associated with longer disease duration and more severe disease, while only reservoir function was associated with more fibrotic skin changes. All LA strain parameters correlated significantly with E/E’ ratio while positive peak LA and sec. positive peak LA were demonstrated as LVDD predictors in patients with SSc.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
  References Top

1.
Candell-Riera J, Armadans-Gil L, Simeón CP, Castell-Conesa J, Fonollosa-Pla V, García-del-Castillo H et al. Comprehensive noninvasive assessment of cardiac involvement in limited systemic sclerosis. Arthritis Rheum 1996; 39:1138–1145.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Follansbee WP, Miller TR, Curtiss EI, Orie JE, Bernstein RL, Kiernan JM et al. A controlled clinicopathologic study of myocardial fibrosis in systemic sclerosis (scleroderma). J Rheumatol 1990; 17:656–662.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Bulkley BH, Ridolfi RL, Salyer WR, Hutchins GM. Myocardial lesions of progressive systemic sclerosis. A cause of cardiac dysfunction. Circulation 1976; 53:483–490.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Postlethwaite AE, Harris LJ, Raza SH, Kodura S, Akhigbe T. Pharmacotherapy of systemic sclerosis. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2010; 11:789–806.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Tyndall AJ, Bannert B, Vonk M, Airò P, Cozzi F, Carreira PE et al. Causes and risk factors for death in systemic sclerosis: a study from the EULAR Scleroderma Trials and Research (EUSTAR) database. Ann Rheum Dis 2010; 69:1809–1815.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Elshereef RR, Hassan AA, Darwish AF, Asklany HT, Hamdy L. Pulmonary hypertension in scleroderma and its relation to disease activity. Egypt Rheumatol Rehabil 2013; 40:173–180.  Back to cited text no. 6
  [Full text]  
7.
Ioannidis JP, Vlachoyiannopoulos PG, Haidich AB, Medsger TA Jr, Lucas M, Michet CJ et al. Mortality in systemic sclerosis: an international meta-analysis of individual patient data. Am J Med 2005; 118:2–10.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Nagueh SF, Appleton CP, Gillebert TC, Marino PN, Oh JK, Smiseth OA et al. Recommendations for the evaluation of left ventricular diastolic function by echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2009; 22:107–133.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Blume GG, Mcleod CJ, Barnes ME, Seward JB, Pellikka PA, Bastiansen PM et al. Left atrial function: physiology, assessment, and clinical implications. Eur J Echocardiogr 2011; 12:421–430.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Bilen E, Kurt M, Tanboğa IH, Koçak U, Ayhan H, Durmaz T et al. Assessment of left atrial phasic functions in heart failure patients with preserved or low ejection fractions. Arch Turk Soc Cardiol 2012; 40:122–128.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Dandel M, Knosalla C, Lehmkuhl H, Hetzer R. Non-Doppler two-dimensional strain imaging-clinical applications. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2007; 20:1019.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Van den Hoogen F, Khanna D, Fransen J, Johnson SR, Baron M, Tyndall A et al. Classification criteria for systemic sclerosis: an American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism collaborative initiative. Ann Rheum Dis 2013; 72:1747–1755.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Clements P, Lachenbruch P, Siebold J, White B, Weiner S, Martin R et al. Inter- and intraobserver variability of total skin thickness score (modified Rodnan TSS) in systemic sclerosis. J Rheumatol 1995; 22:1281–1285.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Medsger TA, Bombardieri S, Czirjak L, Scorza R, Della Rossa A, Bencivelli W. Assessment of disease severity and prognosis. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2003; 21(Suppl 29):S42–S46.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Nagueh SF, Smiseth OA, Appleton CP, Byrd BF, Dokainish H, Edvardsen T et al. Recommendations for the evaluation of left ventricular diastolic function by echocardiography: an update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2016; 29:277–314.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Lang RM, Bierig M, Devereux RB, Flachskampf FA, Foster E, Pellikka PA et al. Recommendations for chamber quantification. Eur J Echocardiogr 2006; 7:79–108.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Lang RM, Bierig M, Devereux RB, Flachskampf FA, Foster E, Pellikka PA et al. Recommendations for chamber quantification: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography’s Guidelines and Standards Committee and the Chamber Quantification Writing Group, developed in conjunction with the European Association of Echocardiography, a branch of the European Society of Cardiology. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2005; 18:1440–1463.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
To AC, Flamm SD, Marwick TH, Klein AL. Clinical utility of multimodalityLA imaging: assessment of size, function, and structure. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2011; 4:788–798.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Motoki H, Dahiya A, Bhargava M, Wazni OM, Saliba WI, Marwick TH et al. Assessment of left atrial mechanics in patients with atrial fibrillation: comparison between two-dimensional speckle-based strain and velocity vector imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2012; 25:428–435.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Ersbøll M, Andersen MJ, Valeur N, Mogensen UM, Waziri H, Møller JE et al. The prognostic value of left atrial peak reservoir strain in acute myocardial infarction is dependent on left ventricular longitudinal function and left atrial size. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2013; 6:26–33.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Serri K, Reant P, Lafitte M, Berhouet M, Le Bouffos V, Roudaut R et al. Global and regional myocardial function quantification by two dimensional strain. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006; 47:1175–1181.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Vieira MJ, Teixeira R, Gonçalves L, Gersh BJ. Left atrial mechanics: echocardiographic assessment and clinical implications. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2014; 27:463–478.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Morris DA, Takeuchi M, Krisper M, Köhncke C, Bekfani T, Carstensen T et al. Normal values and clinical relevance of left atrial myocardial function analysed by speckle-tracking echocardiography: multicentre study. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2015; 16:364–372.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Mele D, Censi S, La Corte R, Merli E, Lo Monaco A, Locaputo A et al. Abnormalities of left ventricular function in asymptomatic patients with systemic sclerosis using Doppler measures of myocardial strain. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2008; 21:1257–1264.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Ataş H, Kepez A, Tigen K, Samadov F, Özen G, Cincin A et al. Evaluation of left atrial volume and function in systemic sclerosis patients using speckle tracking and real-time three-dimensional echocardiography. Anatol J Cardiol 2016; 16:316–322.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Abhayaratna WP, Seward JB, Appleton CP, Douglas PS, Oh JK, Tajik AJ et al. Left atrial size: physiologic determinants and clinical applications. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006; 47:2357–2363.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Kurt M, Tanboga IH, Aksakal E, Kaya A, Isik T, Ekinci M et al. Relation of left ventricular end-diastolic pressure and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide level with left atrial deformation parameters. Eur Heart J 2011; 13:524–530.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Stefanadis C, Dernellis J, Toutouzas PA. clinical appraisal of left atrial function. Eur Heart J 2001; 22:22–36.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.
Leung DY, Boyd A, Ng AA, Chi C, Thomas L. Echocardiographic evaluation of left atrial size and function: current understanding, pathophysiologic correlates, and prognostic implications. Am Heart J 2008; 156:1056–1064.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.
Agoston G, Gargani L, Miglioranza MH, Caputo M, Badano LP, Moreo A et al. Left atrial dysfunction detected by speckle tracking in patients with systemic sclerosis. Cardiovasc Ultrasound 2014; 12:30.  Back to cited text no. 30
    
31.
Can I, Onat AM, Aytemir K, Akdogan A, Ureten K, Kiraz S et al. Detecting subclinical biventricular impairment in scleroderma patients by use of pulsed-wave tissue Doppler imaging. Tex Heart Inst J 2009; 36:31–37.  Back to cited text no. 31
    
32.
Spethmann S, Dreger H, Schattke S, Riemekasten G, Borges AC, Baumann G et al. Two-dimensional speckle tracking of the left ventricle in patients with systemic sclerosis for an early detection of myocardial involvement. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2012; 13:863–870.  Back to cited text no. 32
    
33.
Cusmà Piccione M, Zito C, Bagnato G, Oreto G, Di Bella G, Bagnato G et al. Role of 2D strain in the early identification of left ventricular dysfunction and in the risk stratification of systemic sclerosis patients. Cardiovasc Ultrasound 2013; 11:6.  Back to cited text no. 33
    
34.
Cadeddu C, Deidda M, Giau G, Lilliu M, Cadeddu F, Binaghi G et al. Contractile reserve in systemic sclerosis patients as a major predictor of global cardiac impairment and exercise tolerance. Int J Cardiovasc 2015; 31:529–536.  Back to cited text no. 34
    
35.
Valentini G, Vitale DF, Giunta A, Maione S, Gerundo G, Arnese M et al. Diastolic abnormalities in systemic sclerosis: evidence for associated defective cardiac functional reserve. Ann Rheum Dis 1996; 55:455–460.  Back to cited text no. 35
    
36.
Armstrong GP, Whalley GA, Doughty RN, Gamble GD, Flett SM, Tan PL et al. Left ventricular function in scleroderma. Br J Rheumatol 1996; 35:983–988.  Back to cited text no. 36
    
37.
Hinchcliff M, Desai CS, Varga J, Shah SJ. Prevalence, prognosis, and factors associated with left ventricular diastolic dysfunction in systemic sclerosis. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2012; 30(Suppl 71):S30–S37.  Back to cited text no. 37
    
38.
Appleton CP, Galloway JM, Gonzalez MS, Gaballa M, Basnight MA. Estimation of left ventricular filling pressures using two-dimensional and Doppler echocardiography in adult patients with cardiac disease. Additional value of analyzing left atrial size, left atrial ejection fraction and the difference in duration of pulmonary venous and mitral flow velocity at atrial contraction. J Am Coll Cardiol 1993; 22:1972–1982.  Back to cited text no. 38
    
39.
Singh A, Addetia K, Maffessanti F, Mor-Avi V, Lang RM. LA strain for categorization of LV diastolic dysfunction. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2017; 10:735–743.  Back to cited text no. 39
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4], [Table 5]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

 
  In this article
Abstract
Introduction
Patients and methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
References
Article Figures
Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed266    
    Printed20    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded35    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal


[TAG2]
[TAG3]
[TAG4]