• Users Online: 159
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page
Home About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 


 
 Table of Contents  
LETTER TO THE EDITOR
Year : 2019  |  Volume : 46  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 208-209

Magnetic resonance diagnosis of adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder


Department of Radiology, Holy Family Hospital, Thodupuzha, Kerala, India

Date of Submission27-Sep-2018
Date of Acceptance06-Jan-2019
Date of Web Publication15-Jul-2019

Correspondence Address:
Reddy Ravikanth
Department of Radiology, Holy Family Hospital, Thodupuzha 685605
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/err.err_49_18

Rights and Permissions

How to cite this article:
Ravikanth R, Kamalasekar K. Magnetic resonance diagnosis of adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder. Egypt Rheumatol Rehabil 2019;46:208-9

How to cite this URL:
Ravikanth R, Kamalasekar K. Magnetic resonance diagnosis of adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder. Egypt Rheumatol Rehabil [serial online] 2019 [cited 2019 Oct 21];46:208-9. Available from: http://www.err.eg.net/text.asp?2019/46/3/208/262703





A 38-year-old male presented with shoulder pain since 2 months with no history of trauma. MRI showed poor definition and thickening of coracohumeral ligament measuring 5.3 mm with abnormal intermediate amorphous signal (with hypointense foci on all sequences) surrounding the ligament with ill definition of superior glenohumeral ligament and rotator interval, thickening of the inferior glenohumeral ligament in the axillary pouch measuring 13.8 mm, and mild free fluid in the shoulder joint − likely suggesting adhesive capsulitis ([Figure 1] and [Figure 2]). There was associated thickening and diffuse T2 hyperintensity of the long head biceps tendon anchor suggesting tendinitis. Adhesive capsulitis is most common in the age group 45–60 years, a population for whom magnetic resonance arthrography is rarely ordered [1]. It is characterized by a painful restriction of shoulder motion that results in fibrosis and contracture of the glenohumeral joint capsule. Adhesive capsulitis is a clinical condition of progressive pain and decreased range of motion of the glenohumeral joint. Primary adhesive capsulitis is an idiopathic condition characterized by the insidious onset of symptoms, most commonly seen in women older than 40 years, generally without an antecedent inciting event or medical/surgical condition, although diabetes mellitus and hypothyroidism are risk factors for primary type. Secondary causes of adhesive capsulitis include history of severe trauma and prior surgery [2]. The diagnosis and staging of adhesive capsulitis are usually made based on clinical symptoms and physical examination alone. However, clinical diagnosis of adhesive capsulitis is often challenging because many conditions in and around the glenohumeral joint manifest with overlapping clinical features, and no diagnostic criteria for adhesive capsulitis has been established yet. MRI is not widely accepted as a reliable modality for confirming the diagnosis of adhesive capsulitis. Noncontrast MRI can be used to accurately diagnose adhesive capsulitis in conjunction with appropriate clinical criteria. Adhesive capsulitis can be accurately diagnosed on noncontrast MRI shoulder examinations with appropriate clinical criteria without direct magnetic resonance arthrography. Typical MR findings include synovial hypertrophy and debris within the rotator interval seen as replacement of the normal rotator interval fat by granulation tissue or fibrous tissue, thickening of the rotator interval capsule, thickening of the ligaments of the rotator interval, superior glenohumeral ligament (SGHL) and coracohumeral ligament (CHL), thickening of the joint capsule with contracted and non-distensible axillary recess. The thickness of the capsule of the axillary recess is best demonstrated on coronal images at the mid glenoid level. Thickened inferior glenohumeral ligament greater than 4 mm is often seen in the axillary pouch [3]. Magnetic resonance arthrography is the imaging test of choice to assess for adhesive capsulitis. It shows characteristic findings, such as limited shoulder joint capacity and a small or nonexistent dependent axillary fold. However, arthrography is invasive and cannot explore changes in the synovial and capsular membranes. Intravenous gadolinium enhancement increases the specificity of the diagnosis by demonstrating enhancement of the rotator interval capsule and enhancement of the capsuloligamentous structures in the axillary recess. In contrast, MRI is a noninvasive modality and can identify changes in the synovium and the joint capsule and can exclude other causes of shoulder pain that mimic adhesive capsulitis such as rotator cuff tear, tendinitis, osteoarthritis, subacromial impingement, and occult fractures. Adhesive capsulitis has been described as self-limiting, but complete resolution may take up to 2 years. Treatment options for adhesive capsulitis have included physiotherapy, corticosteroid injections, closed manipulations, and capsular release.
Figure 1 Coronal proton density fat-saturated image demonstrating thickening of the inferior glenohumeral ligament in the axillary recess measuring 13.8 mm.

Click here to view
Figure 2 Sagittal oblique proton density fat-saturated image demonstrating thickening of the coracohumeral ligament measuring 5.3 mm.

Click here to view


Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
  References Top

1.
Neviaser JS. Adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder. A study of the pathological findings in periarthritis of the shoulder. J Bone Joint Surg 1945; 27:211–222.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Hannafin JA, Chiaia TA. Adhesive capsulitis: a treatment approach. Clin Orthop 2000; 372:95–109.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Mengiardi B, Pfirrmann CW, Gerber C, Hodler J, Zanetti M. Frozen shoulder: MR arthrographic findings. Radiology 2004; 233:486–492.  Back to cited text no. 3
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

 
  In this article
References
Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed94    
    Printed8    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded35    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal


[TAG2]
[TAG3]
[TAG4]